Jul 1, 2013

Learning from Young Atheists

0 comments
Learning from Young Atheists
What Turned Them off Christianity

Jun 7, 2013

My Apology to Mormon Readers

0 comments
Mike Adams | Jun 05, 2013


Dear Stacey:

You have written demanding an apology for my recent characterization of the Mormon religion as "non-Christian." I am happy to write a public letter of apology to you and to the countless Mormon readers who responded negatively to my characterization.

I am sorry that so many of my Mormon readers have brazenly accused me of ignorance of their religion and suggested that I read the Book of Mormon. I am sorry that they were unaware that I read the Book of Mormon back in 2006.

I am sorry that the science of genetics has refuted claims made in the Book of Mormon concerning the relationship between Native Americans and Semitic people. These refutations undermine the entire historical premise of the Book of Mormon.

I am also sorry that while archeological discovery supports the claims of the Bible it clearly does not support the claims of the Book of Mormon. Battles that were supposed to have occurred in specific locations in North America simply never took place. The archeological evidence just isn't there.

I am sorry about the plagiarism of the Holy Bible that runs through the Book of Mormon. I am sorry that Mormons cannot see that Joseph Smith's refusal to reveal the golden tablets is strong evidence of their nonexistence. The heavy plagiarism in the Book of Mormon puts the lie to the rest of the story of Smith, the former seeker of the lost treasures of Captain Kidd.

I am sorry that my Mormon readers have put all their eggs in one basket by constantly writing to me quoting Matthew 7:16. So I am sorry that I must now apply that verse to the very first Mormon.

I am sorry that among the 33 well-documented plural wives of Joseph Smith, there were close to a dozen unions in which the wife was already married to another man.

I am sorry that in his lifetime, Joseph Smith married four different pairs of sisters. I am sorry that Joseph Smith married a young woman and also married her mother.

I am sorry that some of Joseph Smith's marriages were the result of religious coercion secured only after he told the prospective bride that marrying him would ensure the bride’s place in heaven. I am sorry that Smith also coerced teenagers into marrying him by promising their families a place in heaven.

I am sorry that Joseph Smith kept fourteen-year-old Helen Mar Kimball from marrying her sweetheart Horace Whitney because he wanted to marry the teenager instead. I am sorry that Joseph Smith also asked Helen’s father Heber C. Kimball to give him his wife.

I am sorry that before he eventually married Helen, Joseph Smith gave her a 24-hour deadline to give in to his offer of a place in heaven. I am sorry that two years after the death of Joseph Smith, Helen married her old sweetheart Horace Whitney. I am sorry that the marriage between Helen and Horace was only temporary because Helen was already "sealed" by marriage to Joseph Smith for eternity. I am sorry that Horace Whitney was "sealed" to an already dead Mormon woman before his “temporary” marriage to Helen.

I am sorry that after her mother died, Joseph Smith approached teenager Lucy Walker with a command that she marry Smith with the threat of eternal damnation as the punishment if she refused. I am sorry that the year before Joseph Smith died, he said the following to Lucy: “I will give you until tomorrow to decide (whether to marry me). If you reject this message the gate will be closed forever against you.”

I am sorry that the Book of Mormon, which Joseph Smith claims to have transcribed from the golden plates given to him by the Angel Moroni, says the following: “Behold, David and Solomon truly had many wives and concubines, which thing was abominable before me, Saith the Lord.” (Jacob 2:24).

I am sorry that Joseph Smith said the following shortly before his death: "(W)hen I get my kingdom, I shall present it to my father, so that he may obtain kingdom among kingdom, and it will exalt him in glory. He will then take a higher exaltation, and I will take his place, and thereby become exalted myself.”

I am sorry that Smith’s polytheism is not consistent with John 14:6. I am also sorry that since these are the words of Christ, polytheism cannot be Christian. Moreover, I am sorry, my Mormon friends, but the the words of Christ trump the words of Joseph Smith who will never be God.

I am sorry that Mormonism teaches that Christ was not there in the beginning, that god was just a man who became God by following a moral code he did not create, and that we may all become gods by following the same moral code that predates the existence of Jesus. I am sorry that the theological mess caused by Joseph Smith is irreconcilable with the teachings of the Holy Bible.

Finally, I am sorry that my Mormon readers have unfairly accused me of criticizing Mormonism without doing my homework. But I am glad I did. Now I understand the significance of Galatians 1:6-9.

Nov 30, 2012

0 comments
The Magician's Twin - The Case Against Scientism - C.S. Lewis

Nov 10, 2012

School District Reverses Policy, Allows Equal Access to Religious Viewpoints

0 comments

The American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) recently assisted a Church in gaining equal access at a public school to distribute materials related to release time religious and moral instruction. Under California law, parents are permitted to request that their children be released from school supervision for a limited period every month in order for their child to receive religious and moral instruction that the child does not receive from the public school.

Unfortunately, the school district had a policy that prohibited anyone from distributing “religious materials” including information related to the release time religious and moral instruction that was authorized under state law. To make matters worse, the district allowed distribution of secular materials and specifically targeted religious materials for discrimination.

After discussing the issue with our client, the ACLJ drafted a letter explaining that the school’s policy constitutes viewpoint discrimination against religious speech and that the policy violated the First Amendment’s prohibition on restricting free speech. In addition, we explained that the policy was facially inconsistent with the state law which allows supervised release time for religious and moral instruction.

Thankfully, after church representatives presented the letter to the school district explaining the law, the school district has agreed to change its policy to comply with First Amendment requirements and give equal access to all viewpoints. The Church will now have equal access to distribute material related to the release time religious and moral instruction.

The ACLJ is pleased with this outcome and looks forward to continuing to vigilantly protect and ensure the ongoing viability of religious freedom and liberty in the United States and around the world.

Sep 4, 2012

Vote "Yes" on Wyoming's Constitutional Amendment A

1 comments

Constitutional Amendment A is an amendment to the WYOMING Constitution and does not change our U.S. Constitution. It is an amendment that was sponsored by our dear friend Senator Leslie Nutting (R-Cheyenne) in 2011. The goal was to make sure that Obamacare or future federal mandated healthcare programs cannot be implemented against the will of the people in Wyoming. The need for this Wyoming Amendment is quite clear when we are all being faced with Obamacare' s burdensome tax (or should I say penalties) when fully implemented. We hope we can count on your support of this amendment as well as your help in spreading the word of how important it is to vote YES on it.  
  


In the event President Obama is re-elected, this amendment is the ONLY protection the citizens of Wyoming have against Obamacare!

However, the Wyoming Watchdogs  (not affiliated with WyWatch) is an organization who is spreading misinformation about this amendment, stating incorrectly that it creates new powers or new rights for the legislature to control healthcare in Wyoming. The Wyoming Legislature already has these powers with or without the ballot initiative known as Constitutional Amendment A.

Here is a part of the legislative record of Wyoming Watchdogs (again, no affiliation to WyWatch):

The Wyoming Watchdogs claim to be conservative, but they have helped the progressive, liberal left with their efforts at the state legislature more than they have defended the sanctity of LIFE, MARRIAGE, and Constitutional FREEDOM. Can you trust them or anyone associated with them?
 
WyWatch has never been one to think that we are more intelligent than the average citizen. Our job, or mission as we see it, has been about analyzing legislation or documents and seeking out experts who can help us understand important nuances. When conflicts of interpretation come up, we work diligently to get these expert opinions to you, our members.

Because WyWatch has learned it is best to seek PROFESSIONAL and EXPERT opinions on issues concerning our state statutes and constitution we went to a Hillsdale College graduate attorney and a Harvard Law School graduate who worked for Home School Legal Defense Association, which resides on Patrick Henry College's campus. These two fine attorneys did an excellent job of reviewing the ballot initiative known as Constitutional Amendment A and we would be thrilled if you would take the time to read their analysis.

Click Here to view Steve Klein's comments from the Wyoming Liberty Group (the Hillsdale graduate).

Click Here to view Scott W. Somerville's comments who worked for HSLDA for years which is associated with Patrick Henry College.

However, I want to point out something to you. Steve Kline from the Wyoming Liberty Group took the arguments from a concerned patriot who did a side by side comparison of the original amendment vs. what actually passed both houses with overwhelming majorities, and refuted the side by side arguments. Steve's comments are in RED.

The other attorney, Scott W. Somerville, reviewed the ballot language and the enrolled act that passed both the house and the senate in 2011 and did a beautiful job of explaining the importance of passing Constitutional Amendment A.

We encourage you all to compare what you hear and what you read between now and November 6th with what these constitutional attorneys have written. We hope that the links to the two documents we provide above will solidify your trust in the legislative and lobbying process that WyWatch uses now and will continue to use in the future.

If you have any further questions we will be happy to discuss them with you or better yet, put you in touch with the experts who can answer them for you. We are not afraid to tell you that we depend heavily on alliances with experts across the country to make sure what we do is not only Biblical, but also Constitutional. We hope we have earned your trust enough to depend on us for that. 
 

Copyright 2009 All Rights Reserved Revolution Two Church theme by Brian Gardner | Blogger template converted & enhanced by eBlog Templates